top of page
  • Writer's pictureTITAN

A Critical Look at Generative AI's Impact on the Future of Work

We recently were co-hosts for a policy and innovation conference on generative AI and disinformation. The event provided us not only with insights into our mission of countering false information online, but also into other way's generative AI can be used In the workplace. Whilst this dynamic technological evolution is undoubtedly exciting and has the potential for transforming industries and lives in the next two to five years, its integration into our working day can also be a double-edged sword. The current reality of the implementation is a mix of successes, challenges, and intricate ethical considerations that demand closer scrutiny. We thought we'd take a critical look at application areas already in use.

AI robot on bench reading

1. Bid Writing: A Mirage of Efficiency?

On the surface, the automation of bid writing through generative AI seems like a dream come true, especially for time and resource constrained smaller businesses who don't have the same bid management capabilities of larger corporates. However, the devil is in the details. While AI-generated proposals may save time, they often lack the nuanced understanding of clients' unique needs. The current result can be cookie-cutter style proposals that fail to truly connect with potential clients. The race for efficiency, and the ability to churn out bids at an astonishing rate, risks sacrificing the art of crafting personalised and compelling narratives.

2. Analysis and Report Writing: Illusionary Insights?

Generative AI's prowess in generating reports conceals a deeper problem. The insights produced might be factually accurate, yet lack the context and interpretive depth that human analysts provide, like the bid writing capabilities above. These reports, devoid of critical thinking and intuition, risk leading organisations down misguided paths as they fail to capture the complex interplay of markets.

3. HR: Dehumanising Processes?

While AI-driven HR processes claim to expedite recruitment and employee management, they often strip away the human touch. Resume screening by AI, for instance, might weed out potentially exceptional candidates who don't fit a pre-defined mould because they haven't followed a conventional career path, yet could bring much needed fresh perspectives to the team. The reliance on AI in hiring also perpetuates biases present in the training data.

4. Marketing and Communications: Masking Authenticity?

AI-generated marketing content is a mixed blessing. While it can churn out posts and campaigns at an impressive rate, again, the content often lacks the genuine human touch that resonates with audiences. The flood of AI-driven content risks oversaturation and numbing consumers to marketing efforts through feeds being flooded with robotic, formulaic content that fails to spark engagement or loyalty.

5. Financial Services: Risky Opportunity?

In the realm of financial services, generative AI presents the illusion of data-driven precision. However, the algorithms powering these systems are often inscrutable black boxes, making it hard to pinpoint the root of errors or biases. Relying solely on AI for financial decision-making poses grave risks on a very human level. For example, if a financial institution's AI-driven risk assessment algorithm incorrectly flags a creditworthy applicant as high-risk, this could lead lead to unjustified loan denials, reputation damage and even worse.

6. Training: Superficial Learning?

AI-powered training modules may seem cutting-edge, but often tend to focus on superficial content rather than fostering deep understanding or supporting critical thinking. The human element of mentoring, context setting, and emotional intelligence is absent, potentially leaving employees with a shallow grasp of complex concepts.


7. Procurement: Rocky Efficiency?

While AI streamlines procurement by predicting demand and suggesting suppliers, it often fails to account for dynamic market shifts and unforeseen disruptions. Relying solely on AI recommendations could lead to supply chain vulnerabilities and losses.

This is only a small glimpse into how generative AI will affect the future of work. It's integration into work processes is an extremely complex journey. While it offers multiple efficiency gains, the trade-off often involves sacrificing human insight, authenticity, and critical thinking. Striking the right balance between AI automation and preserving human ingenuity remains a challenge and is likely to need regulation with multiple perspectives contributing - from psychologists, to technical specialists, to legal experts.

As we march forward in TITAN, we believe its imperative to approach generative AI with a critical perspective, holding it accountable for its limitations and ethically navigating its potential minefields. We need generative AI to help support human critical thinking, not replace it!

Join us: Subscribe for updates

31 views0 comments


bottom of page